<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox versus Opera Memory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pthree.org/2005/12/31/firefox-versus-opera-memory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pthree.org/2005/12/31/firefox-versus-opera-memory/</link>
	<description>Linux.  GNU.  Freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-almost-rc-9997</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2005/12/31/firefox-versus-opera-memory/#comment-99402</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2005/12/31/firefox-versus-opera-memory/#comment-99402</guid>
		<description>1 If you have Addons installed, it would weigh down Firefox more.
--
Obviously, since you said Opera needs extensions, you have extensions installed on Firefox atm.
--
2 Why is Opera opened under Administrator, and Firefox is not?
3 Did you clear all the data from both before you tested?

Btw, FF 3b5 fixed most of the memory leak; Firefox 3 will be released sooner than you think, and you should like it better than Opera, even if Opera got addons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 If you have Addons installed, it would weigh down Firefox more.<br />
&#8211;<br />
Obviously, since you said Opera needs extensions, you have extensions installed on Firefox atm.<br />
&#8211;<br />
2 Why is Opera opened under Administrator, and Firefox is not?<br />
3 Did you clear all the data from both before you tested?</p>
<p>Btw, FF 3b5 fixed most of the memory leak; Firefox 3 will be released sooner than you think, and you should like it better than Opera, even if Opera got addons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbw</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2005/12/31/firefox-versus-opera-memory/#comment-62415</link>
		<dc:creator>dbw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 23:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2005/12/31/firefox-versus-opera-memory/#comment-62415</guid>
		<description>Opera is lighter and has documented faster page-load times than FF.  But, (in Linux) when I close Opera, it does not release all the RAM it had reserved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is lighter and has documented faster page-load times than FF.  But, (in Linux) when I close Opera, it does not release all the RAM it had reserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yunus&#8217;un günlüğü &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox vs Opera</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2005/12/31/firefox-versus-opera-memory/#comment-45579</link>
		<dc:creator>yunus&#8217;un günlüğü &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox vs Opera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2005/12/31/firefox-versus-opera-memory/#comment-45579</guid>
		<description>[...] ile opera&#8217;nın bellek kullanımı açısından kıyasalanabileceği bir resim var. Resmi şu siteden aldım. Bende bu değerler opera lehine çıksa bile birbirinie yakın çıktı. Zamanla [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ile opera&#8217;nın bellek kullanımı açısından kıyasalanabileceği bir resim var. Resmi şu siteden aldım. Bende bu değerler opera lehine çıksa bile birbirinie yakın çıktı. Zamanla [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
