<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why XMPP Part 4- Security Means Peace Of Mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/</link>
	<description>Linux.  GNU.  Freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1-10015</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Barlow</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-77599</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-77599</guid>
		<description>So...If I understand correctly, it's not possible to sniff a Gtalk chat over XMPP (which uses SSL encryption). Is that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;If I understand correctly, it&#8217;s not possible to sniff a Gtalk chat over XMPP (which uses SSL encryption). Is that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Rose</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-65502</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-65502</guid>
		<description>Sadly, Erik is right. I know this from experience. Google Talk seems to be the easiest way to get people using Jabber though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, Erik is right. I know this from experience. Google Talk seems to be the easiest way to get people using Jabber though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61891</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61891</guid>
		<description>The one to consolidate into would be then "something else".. Because of the video, audio &#38; whiteboard support of the others.. It's not about attitude, it takes one helluva MEAN attitude to force people to switch to inferior products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one to consolidate into would be then &#8220;something else&#8221;.. Because of the video, audio &amp; whiteboard support of the others.. It&#8217;s not about attitude, it takes one helluva MEAN attitude to force people to switch to inferior products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61843</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61843</guid>
		<description>Erik - looks like they'll never switch with that attitude.  Have you ever mentioned Jabber to them?  Give it a try, you might be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik - looks like they&#8217;ll never switch with that attitude.  Have you ever mentioned Jabber to them?  Give it a try, you might be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61817</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61817</guid>
		<description>@erik:

You can still use Jabber and connect to an MSN Transport.

Better to consolidate on one program however possible instead of being forced into using 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@erik:</p>
<p>You can still use Jabber and connect to an MSN Transport.</p>
<p>Better to consolidate on one program however possible instead of being forced into using 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61782</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61782</guid>
		<description>"Hopefully, this is the straw that breaks the camel’s back when it comes to convincing anyone to move to Jabber and ditch their proprietary accounts."

Sure, when you can get the msn messenger users that I have to chat with to switch. It's network effect, sorry.. No can do. Likely, ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hopefully, this is the straw that breaks the camel’s back when it comes to convincing anyone to move to Jabber and ditch their proprietary accounts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, when you can get the msn messenger users that I have to chat with to switch. It&#8217;s network effect, sorry.. No can do. Likely, ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
