<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why XMPP Part 4- Security Means Peace Of Mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/</link>
	<description>Linux.  GNU.  Freedom.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 07:36:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta2-20489</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Barlow</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-77599</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-77599</guid>
		<description>So...If I understand correctly, it&#039;s not possible to sniff a Gtalk chat over XMPP (which uses SSL encryption). Is that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;If I understand correctly, it&#8217;s not possible to sniff a Gtalk chat over XMPP (which uses SSL encryption). Is that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Rose</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-65502</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-65502</guid>
		<description>Sadly, Erik is right. I know this from experience. Google Talk seems to be the easiest way to get people using Jabber though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, Erik is right. I know this from experience. Google Talk seems to be the easiest way to get people using Jabber though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61891</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61891</guid>
		<description>The one to consolidate into would be then &quot;something else&quot;.. Because of the video, audio &amp; whiteboard support of the others.. It&#039;s not about attitude, it takes one helluva MEAN attitude to force people to switch to inferior products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one to consolidate into would be then &#8220;something else&#8221;.. Because of the video, audio &amp; whiteboard support of the others.. It&#8217;s not about attitude, it takes one helluva MEAN attitude to force people to switch to inferior products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61843</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61843</guid>
		<description>Erik - looks like they&#039;ll never switch with that attitude.  Have you ever mentioned Jabber to them?  Give it a try, you might be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik &#8211; looks like they&#8217;ll never switch with that attitude.  Have you ever mentioned Jabber to them?  Give it a try, you might be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61817</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61817</guid>
		<description>@erik:

You can still use Jabber and connect to an MSN Transport.

Better to consolidate on one program however possible instead of being forced into using 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@erik:</p>
<p>You can still use Jabber and connect to an MSN Transport.</p>
<p>Better to consolidate on one program however possible instead of being forced into using 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61782</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/07/17/why-xmpp-part-4-security-means-peace-of-mind/#comment-61782</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hopefully, this is the straw that breaks the camel’s back when it comes to convincing anyone to move to Jabber and ditch their proprietary accounts.&quot;

Sure, when you can get the msn messenger users that I have to chat with to switch. It&#039;s network effect, sorry.. No can do. Likely, ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hopefully, this is the straw that breaks the camel’s back when it comes to convincing anyone to move to Jabber and ditch their proprietary accounts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, when you can get the msn messenger users that I have to chat with to switch. It&#8217;s network effect, sorry.. No can do. Likely, ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

