<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aptitude vs Apt-Get</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/</link>
	<description>Linux.  GNU.  Freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-107388</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 05:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-107388</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OS Quest &#187; &#187; Ubuntu Server Project #2: Updating the Install and the Basics</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-88707</link>
		<dc:creator>The OS Quest &#187; &#187; Ubuntu Server Project #2: Updating the Install and the Basics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-88707</guid>
		<description>[...] Toponce has a recent article with well laid out logic for aptitude which is based on this older explanation of aptitude. But there does seem to be a minor religious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Toponce has a recent article with well laid out logic for aptitude which is based on this older explanation of aptitude. But there does seem to be a minor religious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "Apt"</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-87984</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "Apt"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-87984</guid>
		<description>[...] online community. The best part is ... it's all 100% free! check them out here: Join Hey Nielsen!  Aptitude vs Apt-Get&#160;saved by 1 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;gillyrudolf bookmarked on 01/05/08 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online community. The best part is &#8230; it&#8217;s all 100% free! check them out here: Join Hey Nielsen!  Aptitude vs Apt-Get&nbsp;saved by 1 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;gillyrudolf bookmarked on 01/05/08 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks Tagged Slick</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-87509</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks Tagged Slick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-87509</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged slick Aptitude vs Apt-Get&#160;saved by 1 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;jynxcat8 bookmarked on 12/31/07 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged slick Aptitude vs Apt-Get&nbsp;saved by 1 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;jynxcat8 bookmarked on 12/31/07 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Beatty Consulting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Ubuntu Server 7.04 Installation in VMware</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-81790</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Beatty Consulting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Ubuntu Server 7.04 Installation in VMware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 02:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-81790</guid>
		<description>[...] Aptitude vs Apt-Get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aptitude vs Apt-Get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erboristeria</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-81451</link>
		<dc:creator>Erboristeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-81451</guid>
		<description>I prefer use the opensuse distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer use the opensuse distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munich Unix &#187; Aptitude vs. Apt-Get</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-75476</link>
		<dc:creator>Munich Unix &#187; Aptitude vs. Apt-Get</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-75476</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipomolo</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-74052</link>
		<dc:creator>pipomolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-74052</guid>
		<description>Nice article...

Though i disagree on one point...if you use aptitude to remove a package installed with apt-get, it will perfectly remove all dependencies.

When removing a package, aptitude checks if there will be some unused packages, not caring about the way there were installed...I'm pretty sure aptitude would remove an unused package, even if it had been installed manually, using a dpkg command.

Try it yourself if you need to be convinced of that...there's no problem at all with mixing apt-get and aptitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article&#8230;</p>
<p>Though i disagree on one point&#8230;if you use aptitude to remove a package installed with apt-get, it will perfectly remove all dependencies.</p>
<p>When removing a package, aptitude checks if there will be some unused packages, not caring about the way there were installed&#8230;I&#8217;m pretty sure aptitude would remove an unused package, even if it had been installed manually, using a dpkg command.</p>
<p>Try it yourself if you need to be convinced of that&#8230;there&#8217;s no problem at all with mixing apt-get and aptitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fyorl</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-69473</link>
		<dc:creator>Fyorl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-69473</guid>
		<description>RPM hell no longer exists. It's called YUM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RPM hell no longer exists. It&#8217;s called YUM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telemachus</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-67445</link>
		<dc:creator>Telemachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-67445</guid>
		<description>@Alex Chekholko &#38; Lucato - You can keep Aptitude from automatically installing recommended packages by adding this to the /etc/apt/apt.conf file:&lt;code&gt;Aptitude::Recommends-Important "false";&lt;/code&gt;

@ Aaron - Nice post. You will be either happy or sad or just amused to hear that this blog entry has led to a four page (and counting) Aptitude vs. apt-get thread on &lt;a href="http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=18033&#38;highlight=" rel="nofollow"&gt;forums.debian.net&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alex Chekholko &amp; Lucato - You can keep Aptitude from automatically installing recommended packages by adding this to the /etc/apt/apt.conf file:<pre class="php">Aptitude::<span style="color: #006600;">Recommends</span>-Important <span style="color: #ff0000;">&quot;false&quot;</span>;</pre></p>
<p>@ Aaron - Nice post. You will be either happy or sad or just amused to hear that this blog entry has led to a four page (and counting) Aptitude vs. apt-get thread on <a href="http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=18033&amp;highlight=" rel="nofollow">forums.debian.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-08-30 : Greg Palmer</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-67016</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-08-30 : Greg Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-67016</guid>
		<description>[...] Aaron Toponce » Blog Archive » Aptitude vs Apt-Get (tags: linux tech software) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aaron Toponce » Blog Archive » Aptitude vs Apt-Get (tags: linux tech software) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Upgrade Ubuntu with apt-get for a smoother transition &#124; Network Administrator &#124; TechRepublic.com</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-66913</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Upgrade Ubuntu with apt-get for a smoother transition &#124; Network Administrator &#124; TechRepublic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-66913</guid>
		<description>[...] libraries, and modules. While browsing several articles on Digg I came across this one: &#8220;Aptitude vs apt-get&#8220;. It looks like Aptitude should be the preferred tool given comments like, &#8220;Aptitude is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] libraries, and modules. While browsing several articles on Digg I came across this one: &#8220;Aptitude vs apt-get&#8220;. It looks like Aptitude should be the preferred tool given comments like, &#8220;Aptitude is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulo F. Sedrez</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-65922</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo F. Sedrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-65922</guid>
		<description>I think the main feature present in aptitude and that I have not seen in apt-get is the hability to downgrade selected packages. It may take a while sometimes, but I can install an older package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main feature present in aptitude and that I have not seen in apt-get is the hability to downgrade selected packages. It may take a while sometimes, but I can install an older package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasS</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-65891</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-65891</guid>
		<description>I used apt-get quite some time and then read that "one should use aptitude". But I never really liked it, because I kept on forgetting how to search for packages the right way ("aptitude search ~dkeyword" was not intuitive enough for me). 

When I read about wajig, I tried it and it was a delight! So if you are just busy trying out aptitude and have some minutes left, just give it a chance too!

Currently I use yum, trying to learn how to use Red Hat... I like Fedora but its packagesystem has not convinced me yet as much as Debians system did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used apt-get quite some time and then read that &#8220;one should use aptitude&#8221;. But I never really liked it, because I kept on forgetting how to search for packages the right way (&#8221;aptitude search ~dkeyword&#8221; was not intuitive enough for me). </p>
<p>When I read about wajig, I tried it and it was a delight! So if you are just busy trying out aptitude and have some minutes left, just give it a chance too!</p>
<p>Currently I use yum, trying to learn how to use Red Hat&#8230; I like Fedora but its packagesystem has not convinced me yet as much as Debians system did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shirish</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-65817</link>
		<dc:creator>shirish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pthree.org/2007/08/12/aptitude-vs-apt-get/#comment-65817</guid>
		<description>Cool info, I just removed 1 GiB of obsolete packages with 
&lt;code&gt; sudo aptitude autoclean &lt;/code&gt;

What I wonder is when I use  if I wanna get rid of the build dependencies &#38; everything of foo how would I go about doing that. The manual of apt-get just says 

 build-dep 
 build-dep causes apt-get to install/remove packages in an attempt to satisfy the build  dependencies for a source package.

Thanx for a great write-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool info, I just removed 1 GiB of obsolete packages with<br />
<pre class="php">sudo aptitude autoclean</pre></p>
<p>What I wonder is when I use  if I wanna get rid of the build dependencies &amp; everything of foo how would I go about doing that. The manual of apt-get just says </p>
<p> build-dep<br />
 build-dep causes apt-get to install/remove packages in an attempt to satisfy the build  dependencies for a source package.</p>
<p>Thanx for a great write-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
