<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Qwest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/</link>
	<description>Linux.  GNU.  Freedom.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta2-24176</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Beattie</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/#comment-110351</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Beattie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1155#comment-110351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the mid-90s, before Qwest bought USWest, I worked for the IT department of a daily newspaper. Our circulation department even back then was able to subscribe to a service from USWest, where every month they sent us the list (on a floppy disk, no less) of new landline customers in our delivery region. Given the general lack of ethics by both companies, it&#039;s no surprise that post the Qwest acquisition, this practice continued.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the mid-90s, before Qwest bought USWest, I worked for the IT department of a daily newspaper. Our circulation department even back then was able to subscribe to a service from USWest, where every month they sent us the list (on a floppy disk, no less) of new landline customers in our delivery region. Given the general lack of ethics by both companies, it&#8217;s no surprise that post the Qwest acquisition, this practice continued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Qwest [ Aaron Toponce ]</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/#comment-110290</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Qwest [ Aaron Toponce ]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1155#comment-110290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Dear Qwest Found 17 hours, 11 minutes ago Linux. GNU. Freedom. From: pthree.org [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear Qwest Found 17 hours, 11 minutes ago Linux. GNU. Freedom. From: pthree.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dibb</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/#comment-110286</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dibb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1155#comment-110286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joseph, really?  That is awesome, that&#039;s what I&#039;m going to do.  I was going to sign up for a landline with Qwest (not a fan of VOIP, no thanks), and I didn&#039;t feel like coughing up the monthly &quot;unlisted number&quot; fee.  I&#039;ll have to give that a try.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, really?  That is awesome, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m going to do.  I was going to sign up for a landline with Qwest (not a fan of VOIP, no thanks), and I didn&#8217;t feel like coughing up the monthly &#8220;unlisted number&#8221; fee.  I&#8217;ll have to give that a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hall</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/#comment-110285</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1155#comment-110285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a fee for having your phone number unlisted, but Qwerst will still sell your number. However, when the line is ordered, you can demand that they do not sell your number to anyone. By federal law, they must comply. This is free. The agents that take orders know this, but will not tell you. The last time I got a voice number from Qwerst, this is what I did. It worked, and I never got a single sales call on that number.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a fee for having your phone number unlisted, but Qwerst will still sell your number. However, when the line is ordered, you can demand that they do not sell your number to anyone. By federal law, they must comply. This is free. The agents that take orders know this, but will not tell you. The last time I got a voice number from Qwerst, this is what I did. It worked, and I never got a single sales call on that number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGM</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/#comment-110284</link>
		<dc:creator>TGM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1155#comment-110284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you guys have the equivelent of a Telephone Preference Service? (We in the UK have http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/). Once signed up, you can get companies in trouble for phoning you.

I realise your query is about Qwest&#039;s views on privacy, and this is more of a cure than a prevention tactic, but it&#039;s worked wonders for me (when I received a recycled number with a lot of sales calls attached!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you guys have the equivelent of a Telephone Preference Service? (We in the UK have <a href="http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/</a>). Once signed up, you can get companies in trouble for phoning you.</p>
<p>I realise your query is about Qwest&#8217;s views on privacy, and this is more of a cure than a prevention tactic, but it&#8217;s worked wonders for me (when I received a recycled number with a lot of sales calls attached!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/#comment-110283</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1155#comment-110283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the most likely explanation is that Qwest is selling a list of customers and phone numbers as a CD or even a download, to telemarketers for something like $0.0015 a phone number or so. The price kept low so that the can sell the list again each quarter, month, or even day.

A &#039;diff&#039; on two subsequent lists would show who had a new number, what their name was, even their city and street address in all likelihood.

I suppose it is also possible that Qwest is simply selling a &#039;daily&#039; update of that diff file for significantly more, perhaps even $0.50 a customer.

Google is already an advertiser, so they may not be as  likely to sell their customer list to telemarketers. Why sell your good customer list to competitors?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the most likely explanation is that Qwest is selling a list of customers and phone numbers as a CD or even a download, to telemarketers for something like $0.0015 a phone number or so. The price kept low so that the can sell the list again each quarter, month, or even day.</p>
<p>A &#8216;diff&#8217; on two subsequent lists would show who had a new number, what their name was, even their city and street address in all likelihood.</p>
<p>I suppose it is also possible that Qwest is simply selling a &#8216;daily&#8217; update of that diff file for significantly more, perhaps even $0.50 a customer.</p>
<p>Google is already an advertiser, so they may not be as  likely to sell their customer list to telemarketers. Why sell your good customer list to competitors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/#comment-110282</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1155#comment-110282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that is part of their business model. In fact, if you don&#039;t want it shared, there is an additional _monthly_ fee. Course, there is a federal do not call list, but that isn&#039;t instant and a certain percentage of solicitors ignore it, and &quot;charities&quot;, people taking surveys, companies who you have done business with, and politicians can ignore it too.

Its too bad its so damned hard for people to understand that I don&#039;t want them calling me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is part of their business model. In fact, if you don&#8217;t want it shared, there is an additional _monthly_ fee. Course, there is a federal do not call list, but that isn&#8217;t instant and a certain percentage of solicitors ignore it, and &#8220;charities&#8221;, people taking surveys, companies who you have done business with, and politicians can ignore it too.</p>
<p>Its too bad its so damned hard for people to understand that I don&#8217;t want them calling me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2009/10/15/dear-qwest-2/#comment-110281</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1155#comment-110281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before the comments come in, the solicitors are calling my friend my name. Sure, the number is recycled. I understand that. I don&#039;t understand how they can already be asking for him by name.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the comments come in, the solicitors are calling my friend my name. Sure, the number is recycled. I understand that. I don&#8217;t understand how they can already be asking for him by name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
