<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elliptic Curve Cryptography in OpenSSH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/</link>
	<description>Linux.  GNU.  Freedom.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta2-24176</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zooko O'Whielacronx</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/#comment-115688</link>
		<dc:creator>Zooko O'Whielacronx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1700#comment-115688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Generally speaking, the equivalent DSA keys would require 4-times the bit strength of ECDSA keys. In other words, a 256-bit ECDSA key is equivalent in strength to a 1024-bit DSA key.&quot;

That&#039;s not the consensus. Check out this cool site that lets you explore recommendations: http://keylength.com .

Here is what it says if you ask it what is equivalent to 256-bit ECC keys:

http://tahoe-lafs.org/~zooko/Keylength%20-%20Compare%20all%20Methods.html

Only the German standards body, BSI, thinks that a 256-bit ECC key is equivalently strong to a 2048 DSA key. The other researchers range from 3072 up to 4440 bit DSA keys as being as strong as 256-bit ECDSA keys!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Generally speaking, the equivalent DSA keys would require 4-times the bit strength of ECDSA keys. In other words, a 256-bit ECDSA key is equivalent in strength to a 1024-bit DSA key.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the consensus. Check out this cool site that lets you explore recommendations: <a href="http://keylength.com" rel="nofollow">http://keylength.com</a> .</p>
<p>Here is what it says if you ask it what is equivalent to 256-bit ECC keys:</p>
<p><a href="http://tahoe-lafs.org/~zooko/Keylength%20-%20Compare%20all%20Methods.html" rel="nofollow">http://tahoe-lafs.org/~zooko/Keylength%20-%20Compare%20all%20Methods.html</a></p>
<p>Only the German standards body, BSI, thinks that a 256-bit ECC key is equivalently strong to a 2048 DSA key. The other researchers range from 3072 up to 4440 bit DSA keys as being as strong as 256-bit ECDSA keys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gepgep</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/#comment-115449</link>
		<dc:creator>gepgep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1700#comment-115449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[asdfasdfa]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>asdfasdfa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 19/2/2011: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.9, ODF Plugfest UK Imminent &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/#comment-115448</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 19/2/2011: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.9, ODF Plugfest UK Imminent &#124; Techrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1700#comment-115448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Elliptic Curve Cryptography in OpenSSH [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elliptic Curve Cryptography in OpenSSH [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Aaron Toponce : Elliptic Curve Cryptography in OpenSSH -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/#comment-115445</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Aaron Toponce : Elliptic Curve Cryptography in OpenSSH -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1700#comment-115445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by toorghezi and Stéphane Bortzmeyer, Jean Baptiste FAVRE. Jean Baptiste FAVRE said: Elliptic Curve #Cryptography in #OpenSSH http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by toorghezi and Stéphane Bortzmeyer, Jean Baptiste FAVRE. Jean Baptiste FAVRE said: Elliptic Curve #Cryptography in #OpenSSH <a href="http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/" rel="nofollow">http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/#comment-115444</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1700#comment-115444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a paper describing ECC on constrained devices, such as 8-bit CPUs. It&#039;s lengthy, but shows why ECC is such a great fit for smaller devices:

http://www.crypto.rub.de/imperia/md/content/texte/theses/kumar_diss.pdf

It mentions in detail the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) protocol (which OpenSSH 5.7 and later supports as well) which is possible on these devices without a cryptographic processor.

Anyway, FYI.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a paper describing ECC on constrained devices, such as 8-bit CPUs. It&#8217;s lengthy, but shows why ECC is such a great fit for smaller devices:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crypto.rub.de/imperia/md/content/texte/theses/kumar_diss.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.crypto.rub.de/imperia/md/content/texte/theses/kumar_diss.pdf</a></p>
<p>It mentions in detail the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) protocol (which OpenSSH 5.7 and later supports as well) which is possible on these devices without a cryptographic processor.</p>
<p>Anyway, FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/#comment-115443</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1700#comment-115443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope, it&#039;s not a typo. I do in fact mean 521 bits. Here&#039;s the RFC: http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc4754.txt

When I&#039;m talking about the algorithm, I&#039;m referring to the encryption/decryption algorithm. ECC doesn&#039;t depend on S-boxes, so it can achieve higher cycles per byte than most other algorithms.

Also, because it&#039;s based on the algebraic properties of elliptic curves, rather than factoring large primes, the math is an order of magnitude lighter to compute, thus it&#039;s great for embedded systems, lower-end CPUs, etc. Even the LOC to implement ECC in any specific language is less than traditional AES, 3DES, RSA, DSA and other algorithms.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, it&#8217;s not a typo. I do in fact mean 521 bits. Here&#8217;s the RFC: <a href="http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc4754.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc4754.txt</a></p>
<p>When I&#8217;m talking about the algorithm, I&#8217;m referring to the encryption/decryption algorithm. ECC doesn&#8217;t depend on S-boxes, so it can achieve higher cycles per byte than most other algorithms.</p>
<p>Also, because it&#8217;s based on the algebraic properties of elliptic curves, rather than factoring large primes, the math is an order of magnitude lighter to compute, thus it&#8217;s great for embedded systems, lower-end CPUs, etc. Even the LOC to implement ECC in any specific language is less than traditional AES, 3DES, RSA, DSA and other algorithms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindcorrosive</title>
		<link>http://pthree.org/2011/02/17/elliptic-curve-cryptography-in-openssh/#comment-115442</link>
		<dc:creator>mindcorrosive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pthree.org/?p=1700#comment-115442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; The bit strengths are 256, 384 and 521.

Perhaps you mean 512? 521 is an.. odd number. 

When you say &quot;the algorithm is faster and lighter&quot;, do you mean the key generation only, or the encrypt/decrypt cycle?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; The bit strengths are 256, 384 and 521.</p>
<p>Perhaps you mean 512? 521 is an.. odd number. </p>
<p>When you say &#8220;the algorithm is faster and lighter&#8221;, do you mean the key generation only, or the encrypt/decrypt cycle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
