Comments on: Setting Up Mutt With S/MIME And PGP/MIME https://pthree.org/2011/09/15/setting-up-mutt-with-smime-and-pgpmime/ Linux. GNU. Freedom. Sun, 13 May 2018 18:21:35 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0-alpha-43006 By: Joseph Ishac https://pthree.org/2011/09/15/setting-up-mutt-with-smime-and-pgpmime/#comment-130859 Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:57:16 +0000 http://pthree.org/?p=2027#comment-130859 Any thoughts on how to handle expired certs? I've been using smime for mail when needed, but due to policy my key expires and I'm issued a new one. As such my id of "12345678.0" becomes "12345678.1" .2 .3 and so on as I import the new certs into my keyring. If I update smime_default_key everything works for the new cert but I can't seem to decrypt my older messages without first modifying this line so that mutt uses the right cert. This becomes rather tedious. Any ideas on how to manage both the current and expired certs or at least have mutt use the appropriate one?

]]>
By: Aaron Toponce https://pthree.org/2011/09/15/setting-up-mutt-with-smime-and-pgpmime/#comment-116422 Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:29:31 +0000 http://pthree.org/?p=2027#comment-116422 Possible? Yes. Practical? No. One would have to be wrapped inside the other. So, either you PGP/MIME your email first, then S/MIME it, or vice versa. Regardless, the recipient will have to verify the outer layer first, strip it, then verify the inner layer. It's hard enough getting people to just do one or the other, let alone work that hard at both. You're best off just picking one of them, and sticking to it.

]]>
By: Leo Bicknell https://pthree.org/2011/09/15/setting-up-mutt-with-smime-and-pgpmime/#comment-116420 Sat, 18 Feb 2012 01:49:32 +0000 http://pthree.org/?p=2027#comment-116420 Is it possible to both PGP/MIME and S/MIME sign a single message? I realize this probably wouldn't work with encryption, but I'd like to send a single text e-mail with both a PGP and S/MIME signature that verify in most clients. Can it be done?

]]>